In a major setback for U.S President Donald Trump, Indian-American constitutional lawyer Neal Katyal secured a historic victory in the Supreme Court of the United States, successfully challenging sweeping tariffs imposed under emergency powers. The ruling marked a major moment in U.S. constitutional law, as the court explained that the president had exceeded his authority by using an emergency provision to impose broad import taxes. The decision not only delivered a legal blow to Trump’s trade policy but also reinforced the constitutional principle that taxation powers rest primarily with lawmakers, saving the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress.
Who Is Neal Katyal?
Neal Kumar Katyal is an Indian-American constitutional lawyer born in Chicago to immigrant parents from India. In addition, he completed his studies at Dartmouth College and later graduated from Yale Law School. As time passed, he built a reputation as one of the most respected Supreme Court advocates in the United States. He has argued more than 50 cases before the Supreme Court of the United States, a rare milestone for any practicing lawyer. In addition, he has also served as acting solicitor general under Barack Obama, representing the U.S. government in major constitutional cases. Now he is a partner at Milbank LLP and a professor at Georgetown University.
What Happened With Trump’s Tariffs and What Katyal Argued
U.S. President Donald Trump imposed large tariffs (Taxes on goods coming from other countries) by using a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. This law permits the president to take economic actions during a national emergency. In reply, Trump said the tariffs are needed to save American businesses and respond to trade issues. On the other hand, several businesses said these tariffs made critical goods more expensive and hurt them financially.
Neal Katyal challenged this decision in court. His primary argument was simple: tariffs are taxes, and under the US Constitution, only Congress has the power to create taxes. He said the emergency law does not clearly say that a president can impose broad tariffs on various countries. According to Katyal, if a president can impose tax alone, it would give too much power to one person and weaken the whole system of checks.
Also Read: India Attends Trump’s Gaza Board of Peace Meeting as Observer, Not a Member
When the case officially went to the Supreme Court of the United States, the judges agreed with Katyal, and the court said the president had gone beyond his legal powers. It rules that the crucial decision, such as imposing tariffs, must be clearly approved by Congress. In simple words, the final decision confirmed that only lawmakers, not the president alone, can decide on taxes such as tariffs.
Katyal shared his reaction on his official X account. In his post, he wrote:
The tweet marks his belief that the ruling was not just a courtroom victory, but also a strong affirmation of constitutional limits on presidential power.